Skip to main content
Glama
emmron
by emmron

mcp__gemini__ai_chat

Engage in AI-driven conversations with customizable model selection to enhance communication and context understanding. Ideal for integrating intelligent dialogue into workflows.

Instructions

AI conversation with model selection

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextNoAdditional context
messageYesMessage for AI
modelNoModel typemain

Implementation Reference

  • Registration of the 'mcp__gemini__ai_chat' tool including schema and inline handler function
    this.registerTool(
      'mcp__gemini__ai_chat',
      'AI conversation with model selection',
      {
        message: { type: 'string', description: 'Message for AI', required: true },
        model: { type: 'string', description: 'Model type', default: 'main' },
        context: { type: 'string', description: 'Additional context' }
      },
      async (args) => {
        const { message, model = 'main', context = '' } = args;
        validateString(message, 'message');
        
        const response = await aiClient.call(message, model, { context });
        return `🤖 **AI Response** (${model})\\n\\n${response}`;
      }
    );
  • The handler function that destructures args, validates message, calls aiClient.call with message, model, and context, and returns a formatted AI response
    async (args) => {
      const { message, model = 'main', context = '' } = args;
      validateString(message, 'message');
      
      const response = await aiClient.call(message, model, { context });
      return `🤖 **AI Response** (${model})\\n\\n${response}`;
    }
  • Input parameters schema defining message (required string), model (string with default 'main'), and context (string) for the tool.
    {
      message: { type: 'string', description: 'Message for AI', required: true },
      model: { type: 'string', description: 'Model type', default: 'main' },
      context: { type: 'string', description: 'Additional context' }
    },
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'AI conversation' and 'model selection', but lacks behavioral details such as whether this initiates a new chat or continues an existing one, authentication needs, rate limits, or response format. This is inadequate for a tool with potential conversational state or model-specific behaviors.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient phrase with zero wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a basic tool and front-loaded with the core concept, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of AI conversation tools (which may involve state, model nuances, or output formats), no annotations, no output schema, and a vague description, this is incomplete. The agent lacks sufficient information to understand how to effectively invoke or interpret results from this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters (message, model, context) with their types and requirements. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining the 'model' options or how 'context' influences the conversation, resulting in the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'AI conversation with model selection' states the general purpose (AI conversation) and mentions model selection, but it's vague about what distinguishes this tool from its many siblings. It doesn't specify the verb (e.g., 'initiate', 'continue') or the exact resource (e.g., 'chat session', 'AI response'), making it less specific than ideal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With 20+ sibling tools including 'mcp__gemini__chat_plus', there's no indication of differences in context, capabilities, or prerequisites, leaving the agent without usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/emmron/gemini-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server