Skip to main content
Glama
emmron
by emmron

mcp__gemini__financial_impact

Analyze ROI and quantify business impact of technical decisions by evaluating cost-benefit scenarios, implementation timelines, team size, and risk tolerance levels.

Instructions

ROI analysis and cost-benefit calculations for technical decisions with business impact quantification

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextNoBusiness context and constraints
decisionYesTechnical decision to analyze
risk_toleranceNoRisk tolerance levelmedium
team_sizeNoTeam size for implementation
timelineNoImplementation timeline6 months

Implementation Reference

  • The asynchronous handler function that executes the tool's logic: validates inputs, generates AI prompts for financial analysis and executive summary, calls AI client, stores results in storage, and returns formatted output with ROI analysis.
        handler: async (args) => {
          const { decision, context = '', timeline = '6 months', team_size = 5, risk_tolerance = 'medium' } = args;
          validateString(decision, 'decision');
          
          const timer = performanceMonitor.startTimer('financial_impact');
          
          const analysisPrompt = `Perform comprehensive financial impact analysis for this technical decision:
    
    **Decision**: ${decision}
    **Context**: ${context}
    **Timeline**: ${timeline}
    **Team Size**: ${team_size}
    **Risk Tolerance**: ${risk_tolerance}
    
    Provide detailed financial analysis:
    
    1. **Cost Analysis**
       - Development costs (labor, tools, infrastructure)
       - Implementation costs (deployment, training, migration)
       - Ongoing operational costs (maintenance, support, updates)
       - Hidden costs (integration, testing, documentation)
    
    2. **Benefit Analysis**
       - Performance improvements (quantified value)
       - Developer productivity gains
       - Maintenance cost reductions
       - Risk mitigation value
       - Competitive advantages
    
    3. **ROI Calculation**
       - Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over 3 years
       - Expected return on investment
       - Payback period calculation
       - Net present value (NPV) analysis
    
    4. **Risk Assessment**
       - Financial risks and mitigation costs
       - Probability-weighted scenarios
       - Worst-case financial impact
       - Risk-adjusted ROI
    
    5. **Decision Framework**
       - Go/No-go recommendation with reasoning
       - Alternative options analysis
       - Phased implementation strategy
       - Success metrics and KPIs
    
    Provide specific dollar amounts where possible and explain assumptions.`;
    
          const financialAnalysis = await aiClient.call(analysisPrompt, 'analysis', { 
            complexity: 'complex',
            maxTokens: 4000 
          });
          
          // Generate executive summary
          const executivePrompt = `Create an executive summary for C-suite consumption:
    
    ${financialAnalysis}
    
    Format as executive briefing with:
    1. **Investment Summary** (one paragraph)
    2. **Key Financial Metrics** (ROI, Payback, NPV)
    3. **Strategic Recommendation** (Proceed/Pause/Pivot)
    4. **Risk Mitigation** (top 3 risks and solutions)
    5. **Success Measures** (how to track ROI)
    
    Use business language, avoid technical jargon.`;
    
          const executiveSummary = await aiClient.call(executivePrompt, 'analysis');
          
          // Save financial analysis for tracking
          const analysisData = {
            id: Date.now().toString(),
            decision,
            context,
            timeline,
            team_size,
            risk_tolerance,
            timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
            analysis: financialAnalysis,
            executive_summary: executiveSummary
          };
          
          const storageData = await storage.read('financial_analyses');
          if (!storageData.analyses) storageData.analyses = [];
          storageData.analyses.push(analysisData);
          
          // Keep only last 100 analyses
          if (storageData.analyses.length > 100) {
            storageData.analyses = storageData.analyses.slice(-100);
          }
          
          await storage.write('financial_analyses', storageData);
          
          timer.end();
          
          return `💰 **Financial Impact Analysis**
    
    **Decision**: ${decision}
    **Timeline**: ${timeline} | **Team**: ${team_size} people | **Risk Tolerance**: ${risk_tolerance}
    
    ---
    
    📊 **Executive Summary**
    
    ${executiveSummary}
    
    ---
    
    📈 **Detailed Financial Analysis**
    
    ${financialAnalysis}
    
    **Analysis ID**: ${analysisData.id} (saved for portfolio tracking)`;
        }
  • The tool definition object including name, description, and input parameters schema used for validation.
    'mcp__gemini__financial_impact': {
      description: 'ROI analysis and cost-benefit calculations for technical decisions with business impact quantification',
      parameters: {
        decision: { type: 'string', description: 'Technical decision to analyze', required: true },
        context: { type: 'string', description: 'Business context and constraints' },
        timeline: { type: 'string', description: 'Implementation timeline', default: '6 months' },
        team_size: { type: 'number', description: 'Team size for implementation', default: 5 },
        risk_tolerance: { type: 'string', description: 'Risk tolerance level', default: 'medium' }
      },
  • Registration of the businessTools module (containing mcp__gemini__financial_impact) into the central ToolRegistry via registerToolsFromModule.
    this.registerToolsFromModule(codeTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(analysisTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(enhancedTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(businessTools);
    this.registerToolsFromModule(licenseTools);
  • Import of business-tools.js module containing the tool definition.
    import { businessTools } from './business-tools.js';
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'ROI analysis and cost-benefit calculations' but doesn't specify what the tool actually returns (e.g., numerical results, formatted reports, recommendations), whether it performs simulations or uses historical data, or any limitations like computational constraints. This leaves significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without any wasted words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded with the core functionality.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the tool returns, how results are formatted, any assumptions in the calculations, or error conditions. The agent lacks crucial information about the tool's behavior and outputs despite the complex financial analysis it performs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 5 parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's in the schema. According to scoring rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline is 3 even with no param info in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'ROI analysis and cost-benefit calculations for technical decisions with business impact quantification.' It specifies the action (analysis/calculations) and resource (technical decisions with business impact). However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'performance_predictor' or 'planner_pro' which might have overlapping financial analysis capabilities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention any prerequisites, constraints, or compare it to sibling tools that might handle similar analyses. The agent must infer usage from the purpose alone without explicit direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/emmron/gemini-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server