Skip to main content
Glama
emmron

Gemini MCP

by emmron
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gemini MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Shannon MCP

      krzemienski
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for Claude Code that provides programmatic management of Claude Code CLI operations through a multi-agent collaborative system.
      2
      -

    • Codebase MCP Server

      cmaujean
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that analyzes application codebases with real-time file watching, providing AI assistants like Claude with deep insights into project structure, code patterns, and architecture.
      MIT

    • Claude Code MCP

      auchenberg
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An implementation of Claude Code as a Model Context Protocol server that enables using Claude's software engineering capabilities (code generation, editing, reviewing, and file operations) through the standardized MCP interface.
      8
      4 npm
      188
      MIT

    • MCP Expert Server

      crazyrabbitLTC
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server utilizing Claude AI for generating intelligent queries and offering documentation assistance based on API documentation analysis.
      7 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have significant overlap and unclear boundaries. For example, 'analyze_codebase', 'analyze_intelligence', 'code_analyze', and 'codereview_expert' all involve code analysis with overlapping purposes. Similarly, 'debug_analysis' and 'debug_master' both handle debugging, and 'refactor_genius' and 'refactor_suggestions' both focus on refactoring. This creates confusion about which tool to select for specific tasks, as descriptions don't clearly differentiate their scopes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent pattern: 'mcp__gemini__' prefix followed by descriptive snake_case phrases. The naming convention is uniform throughout, with no mixing of styles or deviations. This predictability makes it easy to identify tools as part of the same server and understand their general purpose from the naming structure.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 23 tools, the count feels excessive for the server's purpose of AI-assisted development and analysis. Many tools appear to be specialized variants of core functions (e.g., multiple code analysis and debugging tools), suggesting fragmentation rather than a well-scoped set. This could overwhelm agents and lead to decision paralysis when selecting among similar options.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a broad range of AI-assisted development tasks, including code analysis, debugging, refactoring, project planning, security auditing, and collaboration. While there are some gaps (e.g., no explicit tools for code generation beyond APIs/components or version control operations), the surface is largely comprehensive for its domain, allowing agents to handle most workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources