dynamique_immobiliere

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate safe, read-only, idempotent, and open world behavior. The description adds valuable context: how it combines sources, handles missing commune data by still returning AU zones and land sales, and that it never crashes. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is about 150 words but is well-structured and front-loaded with the main purpose. Every sentence adds value, though it could be slightly more concise without losing essential details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of combining three sources and handling edge cases, the description is remarkably complete. It explains input parameters, output registers (note, info, geojson), special cases (dense cities, coastal points), and sources.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and description does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides (lat, lon, rayon_km). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool assesses real estate dynamics and growth potential using three official sources. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools which are mostly health-related, making its unique function evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly mentions when to use (for real estate dynamics and growth potential) and provides guidance on relying on AU zones and land sales in dense cities. Also explains how the tool handles coastal or isolated points, offering clear usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.