teamleader_subscriptions_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the id must exist, error handling, or whether it returns full subscription details. The description simply restates the function without adding context about performance, permissions, or edge cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at one sentence, which is efficient. However, it is so brief that it sacrifices useful context, though it does not waste words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations, and 0% schema description coverage, the description is too minimal. It does not explain what information is returned or how the id is obtained, making it incomplete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'id' parameter beyond implying it identifies a subscription. The schema only states it is a required string, but no format, source, or meaning is provided, leaving the agent to guess.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool retrieves a single subscription by id, which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not distinguish itself from sibling tools like teamleader_subscriptions_list, teamleader_subscriptions_create, teamleader_subscriptions_update, and teamleader_subscriptions_deactivate beyond the implied 'info' operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the name and description imply retrieval of a single subscription, there is no explicit mention of when to prefer this over teamleader_subscriptions_list or other subscription tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.