teamleader_get_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'get detailed information' without confirming that this is a read-only operation, what happens if the event ID is invalid, or any required permissions. This adds little beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler, making it very concise. However, it is also under-specified, so while it earns points for brevity, it does not use the available space to add valuable context beyond the basics.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should indicate what 'detailed information' includes. It does not specify any event fields, potential errors, or prerequisites. For a simple get operation, this is minimally viable but leaves the agent without knowledge of the response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully documents the only parameter, 'id', with 'The event ID' (100% coverage). The description adds no extra meaning about the parameter, such as format or where to obtain the ID, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get detailed information about a specific event' clearly identifies a retrieval operation for a single event. The verb 'get' and the word 'specific' distinguish it from sibling tools like teamleader_list_events (listing) and teamleader_create_event (creation).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implied that this is for fetching details after obtaining an event ID via teamleader_list_events, but no alternative names or conditions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.