teamleader_files_download

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the return value is a temporary URL, which is a key behavioral trait. However, it does not mention expiration duration, access requirements, or potential side effects, leaving some transparency gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with zero filler. It clearly states the action, target, and output without any unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. It tells users what to provide (file ID) and what they will receive (temporary download URL). Minor details like URL expiry are not defined, but the tool's simplicity limits the need for further elaboration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides a clear description for the single parameter ('ID of the file to download'), with 100% coverage. The tool description adds little beyond the schema, simply restating the ID's purpose. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('temporary download URL for a file'), and clearly indicates the required input ('by its ID'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like teamleader_files_list (which lists files) and teamleader_files_upload (which uploads files).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: when you have a file ID and need a download URL. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives (e.g., use teamleader_files_list to find IDs) or when not to use this tool. Guidance is implied rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.