yougile_list_sprint_stickers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the read-only safety is well covered. The description adds a useful behavioral detail that states are embedded in each sticker object, but doesn't elaborate on state structure or pagination behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short, focused sentences with the core verb phrase first. The parenthetical adds essential context about what stickers are, and the second sentence provides a structural note without waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list operation with robust annotations and full parameter schemas, the description covers the essentials: what is listed and a key structural detail (embedded states). It doesn't mention pagination or filtering options, but those are already in the schema, and no output schema exists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, meaning all three parameters (limit, offset, projectId) are fully documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter-level meaning, which is acceptable given the schema's thoroughness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists sprint stickers and clarifies them as sprint/iteration labels for tasks, giving a specific verb and resource. It implicitly distinguishes from list_string_stickers by naming 'sprint' instead of 'string', though it doesn't explicitly contrast with siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_sprint_sticker or list_string_stickers. There is no mention of when to filter by projectId or when a list operation is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.