yougile_get_column

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what the annotations already convey (readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false). It does not describe return format, not-found behavior, or any additional side effects, leaving the agent without useful details beyond the safety hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence that directly conveys the tool's function with no filler or redundant information. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-id tool with one parameter and clear annotations, the description is sufficient for basic invocation, but it leaves the return value undefined ('details' is vague). With no output schema, a bit more specificity about what details are returned would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage for the single 'id' parameter, including a description ('Column UUID'). The description's mention of 'by ID' adds no new semantic value, so the schema carries the burden and the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Get') and resource ('specific column') and distinguishes this from sibling tools like yougile_list_columns (which lists columns) and mutation tools. The 'by ID' qualifier makes the scope unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for retrieving a single column when its ID is known, in contrast to listing all columns, but it does not explicitly state when to use it over alternatives like yougile_list_columns or mention any exclusions. Usage context is clear enough but not explicitly articulated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.