yougile_create_string_sticker

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, implying a write operation. The description's 'Create' is consistent with this. The added 'Use name field (not title)' is a parameter clarification, not a behavioral disclosure. No additional behavioral context (e.g., side effects, required permissions) is given, but the annotations cover the safety profile sufficiently.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short sentences that lead with the purpose and follow with a key parameter tip. There is no filler or redundancy, making it highly efficient for agent parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-parameter create tool with full schema coverage and annotations, the description adequately covers purpose and a critical param hint. It does not mention return values, but the absence of an output schema and the simplicity of the operation make this acceptable. The description is sufficient to guide correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides full documentation for both parameters (name and projectId). The description adds valuable nuance by explicitly instructing to use 'name' rather than 'title', which prevents a likely mistake. This goes beyond the schema's basic descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb and resource: 'Create a string sticker.' This accurately distinguishes it from siblings like yougile_create_string_sticker_state and yougile_create_sprint_sticker. The purpose is unambiguous and specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternatives are mentioned. The usage is implied by the tool name and description, but there is no guidance on when this tool is appropriate versus other sticker-related operations. No exclusions or alternative recommendations are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.