yougile_create_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states that it creates a project and optionally assigns users with roles, which is consistent with the annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). However, it does not disclose important behavioral details such as whether the project creation requires specific permissions, what happens if invalid roles are provided, or whether a message is returned. No contradiction with annotations is present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no redundancy. It front-loads the core purpose and includes the key additional detail about user roles in a compact way.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with two parameters fully described in the schema, the description is adequate. It lacks information about the return value (e.g., the created project object), but given no output schema and the straightforward nature of the tool, this is a minor gap. It is complete enough for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are described in the schema with 100% coverage. The description adds the word 'Optionally' to clarify that user assignment is not required and reiterates the role enum (admin/worker/observer), but this adds marginal value beyond the schema's property descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with 'Create a new project', which is a specific verb+resource and clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like yougile_list_projects, yougile_get_project, and yougile_update_project. It also mentions optional user assignment with roles, adding further clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating a project, but it does not explicitly state when to use this vs. alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions. The context is clear for a create operation, but there is no explicit guidance on when not to use it or what to check beforehand.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.