yougile_get_sprint_sticker

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds useful behavioral context by stating 'States are embedded in the response', giving the agent an expectation about the response structure beyond the basic read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences: the first states the core purpose, the second adds a valuable behavioral note. Every word earns its place, and the information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity—one parameter, no output schema, and strong annotations—the description is largely complete. It states the purpose and mentions that states are embedded, but could optionally mention error behavior or a connection to sibling tools; still, it is adequate for a simple get tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes the parameter 'id' as 'Sticker UUID', which is generic. The description clarifies that it refers to a 'sprint sticker', adding specificity. With 100% schema coverage, this extra clarification raises the value above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get a sprint sticker by ID', which is a specific verb + resource + scope. It distinguishes the tool from listing, creating, updating, and other get operations, and adds that states are embedded in the response.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'by ID' clearly indicates this tool is for retrieving a single sprint sticker when the ID is known. It does not explicitly mention alternatives like list_sprint_stickers, but the usage context is clear and not misleading.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.