yougile_create_sprint_sticker

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the description only needs to add behavioral context. The field note ('not title') is a useful clarification, but the description does not mention side effects, return values, or related entities. It is honest but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short, front-loaded sentences with no unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose and a key parameter detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create tool with only two fully documented parameters and a clear resource type, the description is largely sufficient. It lacks a brief explanation of what a sprint sticker is or what the response contains, but this is minor given the low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds value by warning against using the 'title' field (which might be a common mistake) and by reinforcing that 'name' is the correct field.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Create a sprint sticker') with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes the resource type ('sprint sticker') from similar siblings like 'string sticker', though it doesn't explicitly call out the alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other create tools (e.g., create_string_sticker, create_task). The only tip ('Use name field, not title') addresses parameter usage, not tool selection or contextual prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.