download_doc_tabs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the dry_run parameter behavior and output files, but fails to disclose important behavioral traits like authentication requirements, potential modifications (none), or error handling. Without annotations, the description should provide more context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the core functionality. The bullet-pointed output structure is clear, though the Args section could be integrated more efficiently. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, output files, and parameter meanings with examples. However, it lacks usage context (when to use vs siblings), prerequisites (auth), and error scenarios. The presence of an output schema partially compensates for return value details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The Args section explains each parameter's purpose, provides an example for file_id (search alias 'A'), and indicates defaults for dry_run. This adds significant meaning beyond the input schema, which only defines types and required fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool downloads a Google Doc using 'Hybrid Split-Sync' and specifies the exact output structure (folder with _Full_Export.md and [TabName].md files). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like download_google_doc and export_doc_to_pdf.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., download_google_doc, export_doc_to_pdf). The description does not mention prerequisites, such as required Google authentication or file accessibility.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.