google-workspace-mcp-advanced
Related Servers
Alternatives to google-workspace-mcp-advanced
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoogle Workspace MCP Server1233,130PythonMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Workspace APIs - Docs, Sheets, Drive, Gmail, and Calendar. Enables reading, creating, and editing Google Docs and Sheets, managing comments, reading emails, and viewing calendar events.341917MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceComprehensive Google Workspace MCP server with Gmail, Drive, Calendar, and Contacts integration.2614MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read/write MCP server for Google Drive, Docs & Sheets with bounded reads, gated mutations, and consistent argument naming.26MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA full-featured Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants real-time access to Google Workspace services including Drive, Gmail, Calendar, Sheets, Docs, and Apps Script.10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server that gives AI assistants full, authenticated access to the entire Google Workspace ecosystem.-
TDQS
Scored across 126 tools
Each tool targets a specific Google Workspace service and action, with clear names like 'create_doc', 'send_gmail_message', etc. There is no functional overlap even among similar tools across different services, as they are prefixed by service name.
The predominant naming convention is verb_noun snake_case, consistent across most tools. However, some tools deviate slightly, such as 'setup_google_auth_clients' and 'debug_table_structure', and there are batch variants that add 'batch_' prefix inconsistently.
With 126 tools, the count is excessively high for a single MCP server, including many specialized functions (e.g., multiple debug and batch tools). This volume makes it difficult for an agent to efficiently navigate and select the right tool, despite good naming.
The server covers most core Google Workspace services (Mail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Forms, Tasks, Chat, Apps Script, Search) with robust CRUD and lifecycle operations. Minor gaps exist, such as missing delete for spreadsheets or list for presentations, but overall coverage is very strong.