sdcloud_update_identity_object

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states 'Update an identity object' without explaining idempotency, side effects, return values, or success/failure indicators. This is insufficient for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise but lacking structure. No separation of purpose from details, and no front-loading of key constraints. Could be improved with a brief summary followed by behavioral notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (nested object body, no output schema, no annotations), the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain what 'update' entails, how the body is applied, or any prerequisites. An agent would need to guess the body structure and update semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (body has a description, uuid lacks one). The description adds 'by UUID' for the uuid parameter, but the body description is generic ('matching the target Security Director Cloud schema'), adding little meaningful context beyond the schema. The agent cannot infer body structure or required fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'identity object', with the method 'by UUID'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that update other objects (e.g., update_firewall_policy) and from create/get/delete identity object tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sdcloud_create_identity_object or sdcloud_get_identity_object. No prerequisites or context provided, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.