Retrieve detailed information for a single device by providing its UUID. Use this to look up device attributes, status, or configuration in Security Director Cloud.
Get a single device by UUID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| device_uuid | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the obvious 'Get' operation. There is no mention of side effects, permissions, data freshness, or response format. The burden falls entirely on the description, which is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short and front-loaded with the key action. However, it is too brief to provide sufficient context. While conciseness is valued, it sacrifices clarity and completeness. An additional sentence would improve it without losing structure.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given that there is no output schema and the tool is part of a large SDK with many sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It does not indicate the return value (e.g., device details) or any related operations. A basic 'Get' operation should at least hint at what fields are returned.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'device_uuid' is only described in the schema (type: string). The description adds no extra meaning, such as the format of the UUID, where to obtain it, or any constraints. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'device' with a method of identification ('by UUID'). It effectively conveys the tool's primary function, though it does not distinguish it from other device-related tools like sdcloud_list_devices.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., sdcloud_list_devices) or any prerequisites. An agent would need additional knowledge to decide when to call this function.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.