Retrieve a variable zone object by UUID to access its configuration and attributes for managing firewall and NAT policies in HPE Security Director Cloud.
Get a variable zone object by UUID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but fails to disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic action without clarifying side effects, return type, or any constraints. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior beyond the obvious.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the core purpose without extraneous information. It is appropriately sized for a simple get operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and parameter descriptions, the description is too minimal. It does not explain what a variable zone is, the structure of the returned object, or any prerequisites. This is inadequate for a CRUD get operation in a complex tool ecosystem.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter 'uuid' with no description and 0% schema description coverage. The description does not add any meaning about the parameter's format, purpose, or constraints, leaving the agent with no contextual guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get) and the resource (variable zone object) with a unique identifier (UUID). It distinguishes from sibling tools like sdcloud_list_variable_zones, sdcloud_create_variable_zone, etc., by implying it fetches a single specific instance.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Usage is implied by the standard CRUD pattern, but there is no mention of scenarios or exclusion of other tools like sdcloud_list_variable_zones for bulk retrieval.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.