sdcloud_get_firewall_global_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description labels the operation as 'Get,' indicating a read-only action. However, since no annotations (like readOnlyHint) are provided, the description carries the burden. It does not mention potential side effects, access requirements, or return format, but for a singleton read, the lack of detail is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence that front-loads the essential information: verb ('Get'), resource ('firewall global settings'), and scope ('tenant-wide'). No extraneous words or padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description adequately conveys the tool's purpose and scope. It does not explain return values, but the lack of output schema makes this omission acceptable. The description is sufficient for an agent to understand what the tool does.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and the input schema has 100% coverage (vacuously). The description adds no parameter-specific meaning, which is expected. The baseline score of 4 is appropriate given no parameters exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves 'tenant-wide firewall global settings singleton,' specifying both the resource and scope. It distinguishes from sibling tools like sdcloud_set_firewall_global_settings (mutate) and sdcloud_get_firewall_device_global_settings (per-device), providing clear differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for tenant-wide settings but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., per-device settings). No exclusionary language or when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.