Retrieves the reactivation configuration for a device in RMA state, providing the required settings to restore service.
Get the reactivation configuration for a device that is in RMA state.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| device_id | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Get' but does not confirm it is read-only, any side effects, or requirements (e.g., device must be in RMA state).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of 11 words, which is concise. However, it could be restructured to include more context without losing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description does not hint at the return value or any prerequisites. It is insufficient for a tool with one parameter and no further documentation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter 'device_id' has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description adds no additional meaning, such as format, constraints, or examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'reactivation configuration for a device that is in RMA state'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_rma_reactivation_status' by specifying 'configuration' rather than 'status'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_rma_reactivation_status' or 'get_rma_device_state'. The description does not mention prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.