Skip to main content
Glama
Ollikell

hpe-security-director-cloud-mcp

by Ollikell

sdcloud_list_nat_policy_rules

List ungrouped NAT policy rules for a specified policy ID. Retrieve paginated rule details, apply filters or sorting, or get only the total count.

Instructions

List ungrouped rules directly under a NAT policy.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fromNoStarting index for pagination (zero-based). Default 0.
sizeNoMax results per page. 0 returns the API-imposed maximum.
countNoIf true, return only the total count, no item details.
sortbyNoSort field, e.g. sortby=(name(descending)).
filtersNoFilter conditions to apply to the results.
policy_idYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

B3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic listing function, failing to mention pagination, filtering, sorting, or any constraints, leaving significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence but omits critical behavioral and parameter details. It is concise but under-informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and moderate complexity; the description lacks context on pagination, filtering, sorting, and the meaning of 'ungrouped rules'. Falls short on completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 83%, so the schema already describes most parameters. The description adds no additional parameter meaning or usage context, not even mentioning the required policy_id. Baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('List') and resource ('ungrouped rules directly under a NAT policy'), clearly indicating the function and distinguishing it from related tools like sdcloud_list_nat_policy_rules_in_group.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only states what it does, not the context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools