sdcloud_get_user
Retrieve a specific user's details by providing their unique user ID.
Instructions
Get a user by user_id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes |
Retrieve a specific user's details by providing their unique user ID.
Get a user by user_id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Get a user by user_id.' It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what the return format is, or any permissions needed. The term 'Get' implies idempotency, but no explicit behavioral context is added.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff, but it is overly minimal. For a tool with one parameter, it is acceptable, but it could be more informative without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple nature of the tool (get by ID), the description is incomplete. It does not mention the return value (e.g., user details), which is critical for an agent to use the tool correctly. With no output schema, the description should at least hint at the response.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate. However, it only reiterates the parameter name 'user_id' without adding format, constraints, or examples. It provides no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'user', and specifies the identifier 'by user_id'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like sdcloud_list_users (which returns multiple) and sdcloud_create_user (which creates).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when not to use it, nor does it reference sibling tools like sdcloud_list_users or sdcloud_get_tenant_id for context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.