List users from HPE Security Director Cloud with optional pagination controls for page size and starting index.
List users with optional spec.size/spec.from pagination.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec.from | No | Starting index for pagination (zero-based). | |
| spec.size | No | Max results per page. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description bears full responsibility. It only mentions pagination but does not disclose read-only nature, potential performance impacts, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (8 words) and front-loaded with the core action. It could be slightly longer to add clarity without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with two optional parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It does not mention default pagination values or result format, but this is acceptable given the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for spec.from and spec.size. The description adds 'optional' but this is marginal beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists users and mentions optional pagination parameters. It distinguishes from sibling CRUD tools like sdcloud_get_user, but could be more specific about which user entity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sdcloud_get_user or other list tools. The description implies usage for listing users but gives no exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.