set_price_limit_behaviour

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It states the tool modifies behavior but does not disclose side effects, whether changes are immediate or affect existing orders, any required permissions, or the default state. This is insufficient for full transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two lines plus parameter explanations. Every sentence serves a purpose, and the key information is front-loaded. No unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the core functionality. However, it lacks context about when to invoke this tool, prerequisites, or implications of changing the behavior. It is minimally complete but could benefit from usage guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful explanations for both parameters: 'category' lists valid product types (linear, inverse, spot), and 'modify_enable' specifies that true allows modification and false rejects. This adds value beyond the schema, which only provides titles and types. Schema coverage is 0%, but the description compensates well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: to set a price limit behavior that either allows the system to modify order prices or rejects them. The verb 'set' and resource 'price limit behaviour' are specific, and the distinction from siblings like 'amend_order' or 'place_limit_order' is evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical scenarios, or conditions that would make this tool appropriate, leaving the agent without context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.