get_new_crypto_loan_position

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only says 'get... info' which implies a read operation. It does not disclose any side effects, authentication requirements, rate limits, or data freshness. For a zero-annotation tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence), but it lacks any structure or additional details. It conveys the basic purpose but leaves out any context or usage hints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should explain what 'position info' includes (e.g., loan amount, collateral, interest rate). It is incomplete for an agent to understand the full capabilities of the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter meaning, but it could explain what the tool returns. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get new crypto loan position info' clearly states the tool retrieves information about a new crypto loan position, distinguishing it from loan action tools like borrow or repay. However, it could be more specific about what kind of position (e.g., flexible vs fixed).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs similar get_ tools for crypto loans, such as get_new_crypto_loan_flexible_loans or get_new_crypto_loan_collateral_data. The agent has no context to choose correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.