delete_sub_uid
Delete a sub account by specifying its sub member ID to remove it from the exchange.
Instructions
Delete a sub UID.
Args: sub_member_id: Sub UID to delete.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sub_member_id | Yes |
Delete a sub account by specifying its sub member ID to remove it from the exchange.
Delete a sub UID.
Args: sub_member_id: Sub UID to delete.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sub_member_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description indicates deletion is irreversible but omits details on permissions, side effects (e.g., cascading deletions), or confirmations needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very short and direct, but includes an 'Args' section that is slightly verbose for a single parameter. No wasted words overall.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description lacks context about prerequisites, error states, or expected behavior (e.g., idempotency). Minimal but not fully adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description only restates the parameter name ('Sub UID to delete') without adding format, constraints, or valid values.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('sub UID'). This distinguishes it from siblings like create_sub_uid, freeze_sub_uid, and get_sub_uid_list, which have different verbs.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., freeze_sub_uid). No prerequisites or context about the necessity of an existing sub UID.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JohnnyWic/bybit-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server