get_spread_tickers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states the action without any behavioral traits (e.g., whether it's a read operation, authentication needs, rate limits, or data freshness). The disclosure is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, but it sacrifices informativeness for brevity. Every sentence is present, but the 'Args' section, while structured, adds no value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the tool's description is incomplete. It does not explain what a spread ticker is, what data fields are returned, or any prerequisites. The single parameter is poorly described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description repeats the parameter name 'symbol: Spread symbol', adding no new meaning beyond the schema. With schema description coverage at 0%, the description fails to compensate by explaining valid formats, examples, or restrictions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get spread trading tickers,' which clearly indicates the tool retrieves ticker data for spread instruments. It distinguishes from sibling 'get_tickers' (for regular tickers) and other spread tools like 'get_spread_orderbook' or 'get_spread_instruments'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from these siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_tickers, get_spread_instruments). There are no scenarios, preconditions, or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.