get_borrow_history

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, description provides no behavioral details beyond implying a read operation. No mention of data scope, safety, or pagination behavior beyond limit default/max.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise (2 sentences) but omits essential context like which borrow domain, making it efficient but incomplete.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and 2 parameters, the description is too minimal. It fails to specify the borrow type or return format, leaving the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaning by explaining 'currency' as optional filter and 'limit' as record count with default and max, which enhances the bare schema types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get borrow history' with verb and resource, but it does not differentiate which type of borrow history (e.g., spot margin vs crypto loan) from many similar sibling tools like get_crypto_loan_borrow_history.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as get_crypto_loan_borrow_history or get_spot_borrow_quota. Description only lists parameters, not usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.