get_master_deposit_address

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description omits behavioral details such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or the behavior when chain_type is omitted. The tool may require specific permissions or have side effects, but nothing is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with two short sentences and the args listed. It is front-loaded but could include more context without sacrificing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks explanation of return values (no output schema), does not clarify when chain_type is needed, and fails to mention any constraints or assumptions. For a tool that retrieves a deposit address, more behavioral context is expected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds minimal meaning beyond the schema: 'coin: Coin name, e.g., BTC' gives an example, and 'chain_type: Chain type (optional)' indicates optionality. However, no valid values or formats are specified, and schema coverage is 0%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get master deposit address' which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_sub_deposit_address by focusing on 'master' address.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_sub_deposit_address or get_allowed_deposit_coins. It does not specify prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.