get_coin_exchange_records

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only implies a read-only operation via 'Get' but lacks details on data scope, pagination, or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but uses a structured 'Args' format. However, the brevity sacrifices clarity; it is under-specified rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, no annotations, and a vague description. It fails to explain return data, filtering logic, or how it differs from 100+ sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description must compensate but merely repeats parameter names and defaults. No explanation of what 'from_coin' or 'to_coin' represent (e.g., ticker symbols, currencies) or how 'limit' affects output.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get coin exchange records' but provides no specific context on what these records represent (e.g., transaction history, exchange rates). It fails to distinguish from numerous sibling tools like 'get_trade_history' or 'get_order_history'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.