github_secret_scanning_create_push_protection_bypass

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Create,' implying a mutation, but lacks details on side effects (e.g., whether existing bypasses are affected), required permissions, or rate limits. The agent lacks critical context for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (one sentence), which is concise but at the cost of necessary detail. It saves space but fails to provide enough information for effective tool selection and invocation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (3 parameters, no output schema) and lack of annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what a push protection bypass is, when to create one, or what the request body should contain, leaving a significant knowledge gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema descriptions already cover all parameters (owner, repo, body), so the description adds no extra meaning. The body parameter is described vaguely as 'Request body (JSON object),' which the description does not clarify further, resulting in a baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('push protection bypass'), which distinguishes it from other secret scanning tools that primarily list or update alerts. However, it could be more specific about the context (e.g., for a repository) to maximize clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like secret scanning alert updates or listing alerts. There is no mention of prerequisites, typical scenarios, or related tools, leaving the agent to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.