github_actions_create_registration_token_for_org

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only uses the verb 'create'. It fails to disclose behavioral aspects such as side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or what the token can be used for. The agent is left without important context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. While concise, it lacks structure that could improve readability, such as separating purpose from details. It is efficient but minimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, the description is insufficient. It omits information about the token's usage, return value, and prerequisites. With no output schema or annotations, the agent cannot fully understand the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with a single parameter 'org'. The description does not add any further meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema already handles documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a registration token for an organization' clearly states the action and resource. The tool name includes 'for_org', distinguishing it from its repo counterpart. However, it does not elaborate on the purpose of the token or its typical use.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_remove_token_for_org' or 'create_registration_token_for_repo'. Sibling tools perform similar actions with different scopes, but no differentiation is offered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.