github_repos_get_latest_pages_build

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic retrieval, such as authentication requirements, read-only nature, or behavior when no builds exist. The description adds no value beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource. It is concise with zero wasted words, earning its place by clearly stating the core function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should provide context about return values and prerequisites. It does not mention what a Pages build is, what data is returned, or any preconditions (e.g., Pages must be enabled). The description is too sparse for the agent to fully understand the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: both parameters (owner, repo) have simple descriptions in the schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate per guidelines.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get latest Pages build' clearly specifies the action (Get), the resource (Pages build), and the scope (latest). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like github_repos_get_pages_build (which may target a specific build) and github_repos_list_pages_builds (which lists all builds).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., a Pages site must be enabled), nor does it indicate when to use other related tools like get_pages_build for a specific build or list_pages_builds for history.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.