github_repos_create_dispatch_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the creation action without describing side effects, permissions required, rate limits, or what happens upon success. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence that directly states the purpose. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool, but it sacrifices completeness for brevity. It earns its place by being clear, but could include more detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is insufficiently complete. The agent needs to know what a repository dispatch event is, valid body contents, and expected outcomes. The current description leaves too many gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all three parameters with minimal descriptions. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Since schema coverage is 100%, a baseline of 3 is appropriate, though the description could have clarified the purpose of the 'body' object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a repository dispatch event' clearly states the action (create) and the resource (repository dispatch event). It is specific and distinct from sibling tools, as no other sibling mentions 'dispatch_event'. However, it lacks additional context to differentiate from similar creation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, use cases, or why one might choose this tool over sibling tools like github_repos_create_deployment or github_repos_create_webhook.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.