github_orgs_create_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as required permissions (likely admin), potential side effects (creating a resource), or rate limits. The agent is left without critical information for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but sacrifices necessary detail. It is front-loaded but incomplete, meaning it fails to earn its place by providing adequate information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of creating a GitHub webhook (multiple body fields, permission requirements) and the lack of annotations or output schema, the description is severely inadequate. It does not explain the body schema, event types, or configuration options, making it nearly unusable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema includes minimal descriptions ('org' and 'Request body (JSON object)'), and the tool description adds no further meaning. With no details on the body structure (e.g., expected fields like 'config' or 'events'), the agent cannot construct valid requests.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create an organization webhook' clearly states the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list, delete, or update webhooks. However, it could be more specific (e.g., 'creates a new webhook for a specified GitHub organization').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., repo-level webhook tools), nor are prerequisites like admin permissions or context about webhook events mentioned. The agent receives no help in choosing this over other webhook-related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.