github_orgs_get_org_ruleset_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description lacks behavioral context such as read-only nature, error conditions for missing version, or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short, front-loaded sentence. Efficient but could benefit from minimal structure (e.g., bullet points).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three required parameters and no output schema, the description omits what a ruleset version is and what the response contains, leaving the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions are merely parameter names ('org', 'ruleset_id', 'version_id') and add no semantic value. The tool description adds no extra meaning, so it fails to compensate for the inadequate schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get organization ruleset version' clearly states the action (get) and resource (organization ruleset version). It distinguishes from siblings like github_orgs_get_org_ruleset_history by specifying 'version'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, such as listing versions or comparing rule sets. No prerequisites or limitations provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.