Skip to main content
Glama

github_api_insights_get_time_stats_by_user

Retrieve time-based statistics for a specific user in a GitHub organization within a given timestamp range.

Instructions

Get time stats by user

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
orgYesorg
user_idYesuser_id
min_timestampYesThe minimum timestamp to query for stats. This is a timestamp in [ISO 8601](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601) format: `YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ`.
max_timestampNoThe maximum timestamp to query for stats. Defaults to the time 30 days ago. This is a timestamp in [ISO 8601](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601) format: `YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ`.
timestamp_incrementYesThe increment of time used to breakdown the query results (5m, 10m, 1h, etc.)
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior like read-only or mutability, but it says nothing. The agent cannot infer whether this tool modifies data or requires special permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise but at the cost of clarity and completeness. It is too brief to be helpful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description provides no information about return values, output format, or pagination, and there is no output schema. For a tool with 5 parameters and no annotations, this is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents each parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what is in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get time stats by user' is vague. It does not specify what type of time stats (e.g., API response times, usage frequency) nor differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_time_stats_by_actor' or 'get_time_stats'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over its siblings, such as 'get_time_stats' or 'get_summary_stats_by_user'. The description lacks any context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Eyalm321/github-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server