Skip to main content
Glama

list_integrations

Read-onlyIdempotent

List org-level AI provider connections with optional workspace, type, or tag filters to find integration slugs before model or workspace updates. Returns totals, IDs, names, slugs, providers, status.

Instructions

List org-level AI provider connections with optional workspace, type, or tag filters. Use this to find integration slugs before model or workspace updates. Returns total plus id, name, slug, provider, status, description, workspace counts, and config summary.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagsNoMatch integrations that carry all supplied tags
typeNoFilter by integration type: 'workspace', 'organisation', or 'all' (default)
page_sizeNoNumber of results per page (default 100, max 100)
current_pageNoZero-based page number; the first page is 0
workspace_idNoFilter integrations accessible by a specific workspace

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool call succeeded and returned structured data
dataNoStructured success payload when ok is true
errorNoStructured error payload when ok is false

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.13.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / tags
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "description": "Match integrations that carry all supplied tags",
      +  "propertyNames": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.11.5
    • changedInput schema / properties / current_page / description
      Previous value: -"Page number for pagination"New value: +"Zero-based page number; the first page is 0"
    • removedInput schema / properties / current_page / exclusiveMinimum
      Removed value: -0
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page / minimum
      Added value: +0
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.5.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page / maximum
      Added value: +9007199254740991
    • changedInput schema / properties / current_page / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +"integer"
  4. Addedv1.0.1
  5. Removed
  6. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered without the description. The description adds the org-level scope, but says nothing about pagination behavior, result caps, or ordering despite exposing page_size/current_page parameters, so the added behavioral context is modest.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three compact sentences, front-loaded with what the tool does and the key use case. The final sentence enumerating return fields is largely redundant given the tool has an output schema, which is the only wasted effort.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so the return-value enumeration is not strictly needed, and the description covers purpose, scope, filters, and a motivating workflow. The remaining gap is pagination/result-set behavior, which an agent calling a paginated list tool would benefit from knowing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all five parameters (tags, type, page_size, current_page, workspace_id) are already documented in the schema. The description only restates the filter categories ('workspace, type, or tag filters') without adding format, default, or interaction semantics, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'List org-level AI provider connections', scoped as org-level and noting optional filters. An agent can tell it lists integrations rather than fetching one, but the description never names the nearest siblings (get_integration, list_integration_workspaces, list_mcp_integrations) so the differentiation is inferred rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a concrete when-to-use: 'Use this to find integration slugs before model or workspace updates', which ties it to a real workflow. It stops short of naming alternatives or stating exclusions, so it is clear context without routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools