Skip to main content
Glama

list_mcp_server_capabilities

Read-onlyIdempotent

List tools, resources, and prompts exposed by a specific MCP server instance, returning counts and paginated results to verify server-specific capabilities instead of integration-level lists.

Instructions

List capabilities exposed by an MCP server instance. Returns total plus the current tool, resource, and prompt surface; use this instead of the integration-level capability list when you need server-specific exposure.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe MCP server ID or slug
page_sizeNoNumber of results per page (max 100)
current_pageNoZero-based page number; the first page is 0

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool call succeeded and returned structured data
dataNoStructured success payload when ok is true
errorNoStructured error payload when ok is false

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.11.5
    • changedInput schema / properties / current_page / description
      Previous value: -"Page number for pagination"New value: +"Zero-based page number; the first page is 0"
    • removedInput schema / properties / current_page / exclusiveMinimum
      Removed value: -0
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page / minimum
      Added value: +0
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.5.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page / maximum
      Added value: +9007199254740991
    • changedInput schema / properties / current_page / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +"integer"
    • changedInput schema / properties / page_size / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +"integer"
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.7
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Page number for pagination",
      +  "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / page_size
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Number of results per page (max 100)",
      +  "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
      +  "maximum": 100,
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
  4. Addedv1.0.1

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds useful behavioral context by stating that it returns a total count plus the current tool, resource, and prompt surface, going beyond what the annotations alone provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no filler. The core purpose and the differentiating usage guidance are front-loaded, making the description efficient and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the annotations, schema coverage, and presence of an output schema, the description provides sufficient context for correct invocation. It clearly covers what the tool does, when to use it, and how it differs from alternatives.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters (id, page_size, current_page) are already well documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter-specific meaning, which aligns with the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('List capabilities exposed by an MCP server instance') and identifies the resource. It also distinguishes itself from the integration-level capability list, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells the agent when to use this tool: 'use this instead of the integration-level capability list when you need server-specific exposure.' This directly routes the agent away from the closely related sibling tool list_mcp_integration_capabilities.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools