Skip to main content
Glama
CodesWhat

portkey-admin-mcp

by CodesWhat
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

list_all_users

Read-onlyIdempotent

List accepted organization users with ID, name, email, role, and timestamps to find a user ID for get, update, delete, or workspace-member actions. Enterprise only; non-Enterprise returns 403.

Instructions

List accepted org users with id, name, email, role, and timestamps. Use this to find a user_id before get_user, update_user, delete_user, or add_workspace_member; use list_user_invites for pending invitations. Enterprise-gated. Returns 403 on non-Enterprise Portkey plans.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roleNoFilter by organisation role
emailNoFilter by exact email
page_sizeNoNumber of results per page (max 100)
current_pageNoZero-based page number; the first page is 0

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the tool call succeeded and returned structured data
dataNoStructured success payload when ok is true
errorNoStructured error payload when ok is false

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.12.2
    • changedInput schema / properties / email / pattern
      Previous value: -"^(?!\\.)(?!.*\\.\\.)([A-Za-z0-9_'+\\-\\.]*)[A-Za-z0-9_+-]@([A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\\-]*\\.)+[A-Za-z]{2,}$"New value: +"^(?:[A-Za-z0-9_'+\\-]+\\.)*[A-Za-z0-9_'+\\-]*[A-Za-z0-9_+-]@(?:[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\\-]*\\.)+[A-Za-z]{2,}$"
  2. Changed5 schema fields changedv0.11.5
    • changedInput schema / properties / current_page / description
      Previous value: -"Page number for pagination"New value: +"Zero-based page number; the first page is 0"
    • removedInput schema / properties / current_page / exclusiveMinimum
      Removed value: -0
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page / minimum
      Added value: +0
    • addedInput schema / properties / email
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Filter by exact email",
+  "format": "email",
+  "pattern": "^(?!\\.)(?!.*\\.\\.)([A-Za-z0-9_'+\\-\\.]*)[A-Za-z0-9_+-]@([A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\\-]*\\.)+[A-Za-z]{2,}$",
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / role
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Filter by organisation role",
+  "enum": [
+    "admin",
+    "member",
+    "owner"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  3. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.5.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page / maximum
      Added value: +9007199254740991
    • changedInput schema / properties / current_page / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +"integer"
    • changedInput schema / properties / page_size / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +"integer"
  4. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.7
    • addedInput schema / properties / current_page
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Page number for pagination",
+  "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
+  "type": "number"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / page_size
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Number of results per page (max 100)",
+  "exclusiveMinimum": 0,
+  "maximum": 100,
+  "type": "number"
+}
  5. Addedv1.0.1
  6. Removed
  7. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds non-obvious behavioral context beyond the annotations: Enterprise plan gating and a 403 error on non-Enterprise plans, plus the "accepted only" scoping (vs pending invites). It stops short of describing pagination behavior, which the page_size/current_page params imply but the description doesn't confirm.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: purpose and fields first, routing guidance second, gating/error behavior last. Every sentence earns its place and nothing is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value shape needn't be re-explained. With annotations carrying the safety profile and the description adding Enterprise gating plus sibling routing, an agent has everything needed to select and invoke this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so role, email, page_size, and current_page are all documented in the schema itself. The description's field list (id, name, email, role, timestamps) describes output, not parameter syntax, so it adds little beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("List accepted org users") and enumerates the returned fields (id, name, email, role, timestamps). It explicitly distinguishes itself from list_user_invites, so an agent can tell them apart without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use this to find a user_id before get_user, update_user, delete_user, or add_workspace_member, and names list_user_invites as the alternative for pending invitations. When-to-use and when-to-use-something-else are both covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools