mode_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral burden, and 'Inspects' clearly signals a read-only operation with no destructive side effects. It also adds useful context by naming the specific state areas inspected. It does not discuss auth needs or rate limits, but for a simple state getter this is a minor gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The entire description is one efficient sentence with no filler. The core verb and resource are front-loaded, and the phrase 'Multi-Mode Engine' provides domain context without bloating the text. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter inspection tool, the description names the three state categories returned or exposed. It could be more explicit about the response shape or whether permissions refers to current user permissions versus available capabilities, but the core information an agent needs to decide whether to call it is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description adds contextual meaning about what is being inspected, which is the only sensible addition when no parameters exist. Nothing more is required here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb, 'Inspects', and names the exact resource: current operating mode, permissions, and autonomous loop state. This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling mode_set, which is the complementary mutation operation. It is not a tautology and adds real semantic content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies use when an agent needs to know the current mode, permissions, or autonomous loop state. It does not explicitly list exclusions or alternatives like mode_set, but the context is unambiguous enough for a zero-parameter inspection tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.