keap_get_tag
Retrieve a tag from Keap by providing its unique ID. Access tag details for use in automations or contact management.
Instructions
Retrieve a tag by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tag_id | Yes | Tag ID |
Retrieve a tag from Keap by providing its unique ID. Access tag details for use in automations or contact management.
Retrieve a tag by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tag_id | Yes | Tag ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states a simple read operation, which is accurate, but does not disclose error behavior or return value. Adequate for a straightforward tool but missing behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, short sentence that is immediately clear. No unnecessary words, well front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description is sufficient for a basic retrieval. However, it could mention that the returned tag object can be used with other tools (e.g., keap_apply_tag_to_contact).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers 100% of parameters with a description for tag_id. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve'), the resource ('tag'), and the method ('by ID'). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like keap_list_tags and keap_create_tag.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., keap_list_tags for listing all tags). The description lacks context for when retrieval is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BusyBee3333/keap-mcp-2026-complete'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server