keap_delete_order
Delete an order by its ID to remove it from Keap CRM.
Instructions
Delete an order
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | Order ID to delete |
Delete an order by its ID to remove it from Keap CRM.
Delete an order
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | Order ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral context. It only says 'Delete an order', omitting critical details such as permanence, required permissions, side effects on related entities, or idempotency behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (three words) but lacks structure. While it is not verbose, it fails to include any additional context that could aid the agent, making it borderline under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool performs a destructive operation and has only one parameter with no output schema, the description does not adequately cover context such as return values, error states, or post-deletion effects. It is incomplete for an AI agent to use confidently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description of the order_id parameter ('Order ID to delete') is clear but adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete an order' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (order), matching the tool name. It is specific enough to distinguish from other deletion operations like keap_delete_contact, though it doesn't explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., keap_update_order to modify instead of delete). No prerequisites, warnings, or context about irreversible actions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BusyBee3333/keap-mcp-2026-complete'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server