keap_get_file
Retrieve file metadata from Keap by entering a file ID. Obtain file details directly.
Instructions
Retrieve file metadata by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_id | Yes | File ID |
Retrieve file metadata from Keap by entering a file ID. Obtain file details directly.
Retrieve file metadata by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_id | Yes | File ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It only states a read operation but does not disclose what happens on errors, authorization needs, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise and front-loaded. No wasted words, though could be slightly expanded for completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the description does not explain what 'file metadata' includes, nor error handling or relationship to similar tools like keap_list_files.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter), so baseline is 3. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema's 'File ID' description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Retrieve file metadata by ID' uses a specific verb (Retrieve) and resource (file metadata by ID), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like upload, list, delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as keap_list_files or keap_upload_file. The description does not mention context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BusyBee3333/keap-mcp-2026-complete'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server