keap_get_company
Need a company's information? Retrieve it by its ID to access details for your workflows.
Instructions
Retrieve a company by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_id | Yes | Company ID |
Need a company's information? Retrieve it by its ID to access details for your workflows.
Retrieve a company by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_id | Yes | Company ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or response shape. It is minimally informative.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently states the purpose. However, it could include more detail without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate but lacks context on return values or any prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides for 'company_id'. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Retrieve a company by ID,' which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like keap_list_companies and keap_get_company_contacts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. Usage is implied but not differentiated from alternatives like keap_list_companies.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BusyBee3333/keap-mcp-2026-complete'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server