contract-compass

The four lookups are separable: search_law is statutory articles only, search_references extends to 예규/세부기준/guides, get_law_article pulls one article's full text, and get_law_article_asof handles historical versions — each description explicitly contrasts itself with the siblings. The delay pair is also cleanly split (delay_exemption_guide narrows exemptible grounds, estimate_delay_penalty computes the amount). Mild residual risk that an agent picks search_law vs search_references vs get_law_article wrongly, since all three return law text.

Almost all tools use a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_price_adjustment, decide_contract_method, estimate_delay_penalty, get_case, get_law_article, get_law_article_asof, search_law, search_cases, search_references, report_issue). The lone deviation is delay_exemption_guide, a noun phrase with no verb and a different rhetorical style ('guide'), which breaks the otherwise uniform scheme.

Eleven tools is well within the sweet spot for a domain assistant. Each tool maps to a distinct job — two rule-engine determinations, two penalty helpers, four knowledge lookups, and one feedback channel — with no filler tools and no single-tool thinness.

The surface covers the core lifecycle: contract-method selection, price escalation adjustment, delay penalty plus exemption, current and time-of-contract law, case search and retrieval, and broader 예규/세부기준 search. Gaps are minor and workaround-able — there is no scoring/evaluation calculator (적격심사 배점, 낙찰하한율) or 부정당업자 제재 산정 tool, only reference search that surfaces the underlying criteria.