Skip to main content
Glama
wylieswanson

apple-mail-mcp-server

by wylieswanson

render_template

Read-onlyIdempotent

Render an email template into subject and body text, with optional auto-fill of reply context variables for draft creation.

Instructions

Render a template into ready-to-send subject and body text.

No side effects — caller is responsible for passing the rendered text to create_draft or update_draft (with send_now=True when ready to send).

With message_id, the original sender's display name and email, the original subject, and today's date are auto-populated as recipient_name, recipient_email, original_subject, and today. Without message_id, only today is auto-filled. User-supplied vars always override auto-fills on conflict.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesTemplate name to render.
varsNoOptional dict of variable overrides / additional values.
message_idNoOptional source-message id for reply context.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive; description adds context on auto-population with message_id and override behavior, no contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, front-loaded with purpose, uses bullet-like structure for additional details, no extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given output schema existence, description covers side effects, usage flow, and auto-population details, fully meeting completeness requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% so baseline 3; description adds meaning by explaining how message_id auto-populates recipient_name, recipient_email, etc., and that vars override auto-fills.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it renders a template into subject and body text, distinguishing from sibling tools like create_draft and update_draft.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states no side effects, that caller must pass rendered text to create_draft/update_draft, and when to use send_now=True, providing clear context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wylieswanson/apple-mail-pz-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server