bulk_update_pages

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description lacks disclosure of behavioral traits such as idempotency, validation behavior, error handling for partial failures, or whether settings are overwritten or merged. The note about front_page is helpful but insufficient for a bulk operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a one-sentence summary followed by a parameter list and a crucial note. It avoids unnecessary elaboration, though the parameter list is formatted as a docstring which could be streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (bulk update with 5 parameters) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers the input semantics and a key limitation. However, it lacks discussion of behavioral completeness like atomicity or partial failure handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains each parameter beyond the schema's empty descriptions, e.g., 'Comma-separated list of page URL slugs' for page_urls and specifying valid values for editing_roles. This adds significant meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with 'Update settings for multiple pages at once,' which clearly states the verb (update), resource (pages), and scope (multiple). This differentiates it from sibling tools like update_page_settings for single pages.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates usage for bulk updates but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_page_settings or create_page. The limitation note about front_page provides context but no comparative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.