edit_page_content

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention that the tool overwrites existing content, requires specific permissions, or any potential side effects. The term 'edit' implies mutation, but no warnings or details about reversibility, rate limits, or authentication are given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and structured with an 'Args' block. It is efficient but could be slightly more concise by removing redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, return values need not be explained. However, the description lacks critical context like prerequisites (e.g., user permissions), the fact that it overwrites existing page content, and how it compares to sibling tools. This leaves an agent without enough information to use it correctly in all cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides brief but helpful explanations for each parameter beyond what the schema (which lacks property descriptions) offers. For example, 'course_identifier: Course code or Canvas ID' clarifies valid input. However, descriptions are minimal; 'new_content' says 'New HTML content' but no format constraints or size limits.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Edit' and resource 'content of a specific page', clearly indicating the action. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'update_page_settings' and 'create_page', though not explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'update_page_settings' or 'bulk_update_pages'. Does not mention prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.