Skip to main content
Glama

Get Course Details

get_course_details
Read-only

Retrieve detailed information about a specific Canvas course using its course code or Canvas ID. Use it to view course metadata before managing assignments, announcements, or materials.

Instructions

Get detailed information about a specific course.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
course_identifierYesCourse code or Canvas ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.10.0
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "result": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "result"
      -  ],
      -  "type": "object",
      -  "x-fastmcp-wrap-result": true
      -}New value: +null
  2. Changed7 schema fields changedv1.8.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / course_identifier / description
      Added value: +"Course code or Canvas ID"
    • removedInput schema / properties / course_identifier / title
      Removed value: -"Course Identifier"
    • removedInput schema / title
      Removed value: -"get_course_detailsArguments"
    • removedOutput schema / properties / result / title
      Removed value: -"Result"
    • removedOutput schema / title
      Removed value: -"get_course_detailsOutput"
    • addedOutput schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-result
      Added value: +true
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.0
    • addedInput schema / title
      Added value: +"get_course_detailsArguments"
  4. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true already establishes this is a safe read, so the description carries less burden, but it adds nothing behavioral: it does not say what happens with an invalid or unknown identifier, whether archived/concluded courses are returned, or what 'detailed' covers. With no output schema, the phrase 'detailed information' stays unquantified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler. It is efficiently written, though its brevity comes at the cost of the information a caller actually needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with full schema coverage, the definition is minimally sufficient: an agent can form a call. It is however silent on the shape of the returned 'detailed information' and on how this differs from the many adjacent course-content getters, leaving real ambiguity in a very crowded sibling set.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema itself explains 'Course code or Canvas ID' plus the string-or-integer union, so the description need not repeat it. The description adds no extra meaning such as format examples or whether a code or numeric ID is preferred, which is the expected baseline-3 outcome.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: retrieve detailed information about one course, keyed by an identifier. It is clear on its own but draws no boundary against near-neighbours like get_course_content_overview, get_course_structure, or get_syllabus, which also return course-level data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no hint about which sibling to pick when the agent wants course-level information. The invocation context has to be inferred entirely from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools